A company-wide system implementation. Individual requirements and customisation kept expanding, and the customer, the local organisation, and the global development group each saw the situation differently.
Completing the implementation had become the objective. The business outcomes it was meant to deliver stayed vague, and the project's continuation itself was in question.
There was no formal authority to direct anyone. So agreement was built, one group at a time.
The local organisation first, then the customer's executive team, and finally the global development group. In that order, we aligned on what the problem was, what outcome we were aiming for, and how we would get there.
Then the goal itself was redefined — from "the system is live" to "the business process has changed, new value is continuously absorbed, and outcomes can be measured and improved."
We built a Customer Success Plan jointly with the customer, and set the KSFs and KPIs on the business-transformation side. Customer-facing training was delivered not only to sales but to the technical organisation, so that the direction held regardless of who was in the room.
Answering the requirements as given was not enough. From how the work was actually done, and from the feedback that had accumulated, we mapped the problems and future risks the customer had not yet articulated — and proposed an approach only our own knowledge and technology could deliver.
Where it mattered, we did not simply accept what was asked for. We explained why a different option would produce a larger outcome, grounded in facts and in the impact on the customer's work.
Rather than promising success, we defined the conditions for it, measured them, and made them something everyone involved could correct together.